Here are my five favorite blog posts from the week:
Here are my five favorite blog posts from the week:
In the Christian world people often talking about calling. What they mean is God's specific calling on one's life or for a specific time during one's life. The concept is most prevalent in church world where many people believe pastors must be called to ministry. It's easy to see why they believe that since the Bible has countless instances of God actually calling people to specific ministry through his voice, the voice of prophets and through Jesus.
Last week I was part of a meeting with over 30 children's ministry leaders from about 15 different churches in MD, PA & VA. We gathered to get to know each other, share ideas and learn from one another. We discussed children's ministry hot topics such as partnering with parents, training leaders and volunteer recruitment.
Yesterday I attended the Launch Seminar with Nelson Searcy & Kerrick Thomas that was held here in Baltimore. The seminar is based on the book of the same name and is all about how to launch a new church. Here were some great points from the day:
Here are my five favorite blog posts from the week:
Tony Morgan's new book, Killing Cockroaches, is a must have for any church leader. Most of the book is a collection of Tony's blog posts and articles. I've followed Tony's blog longer than almost any blog I do follow and I remembered some of the posts. Yet, even though I know I've read most of it before it all seemed fresh. Probably because I was in different places in life and ministry when I first read them compared to now. Here are some of my thoughts about the book:
Killing Cockroaches was a phrase Tony used to reference how leaders often times spend too much time on urgent things and not enough time on important things. I have a tough time fighting against the tyranny of the urgent as I'm sure any leader does. I'm not sure if the book helps you fight against what is urgent, but it definitely helps you think about what is important.
Earlier this week I read this post from Mark Batterson. In that post Mark talks about the Biblical account of Paul's experience crashing landing his boat on the island of Malta. In that account, Paul makes them cut the lines to the life boat because he believes that's what God wanted in that moment. In other words, they had to trust God only, because losing the life boats meant they had nothing else….no backup plan.
Mark uses that story to talk about risk and how sometimes God may call us to do something with no backup plan. I think one of the most difficult things to do is to discern God's will in the midst of incredibly risky opportunities. Going through some of the common avenues for seeking God's will is important - (prayer, knowing his moral will, knowing his plan from the Bible, seeking wise counsel, etc).
However, I wonder how often we incorrectly weigh the risk? Some people would be inclined to never risk, and would thereby miss out on God's will for their life. My guess is they would never do anything great (in God's eyes). Some people are the opposite, and would assume that the most risky option is what God is calling them to. This would be similar to what Mark's blog was about. Sometimes the riskiest decision is not God's will at all.
Common sense would lead one to believe that the best place is somewhere in the middle, where you risk some but you don't risk too much. The problem is, you probably always have a backup plan and can never experience what Paul experienced. I'd rather lean towards risking too much, and failing sometimes, than not risking at all. That takes uncommon sense. Failing is okay necessary. See what Craig Groeschel thinks about that:
Is religion an important part of your daily life?
That's the question that was asked to 350,000 Americans in a recent Gallup pole. On average, 65% of the people responded "yes" to that question. But, what should be no surprise, it's not even across the country. The Bible Belt had the most people answer yes to that question with the northeast and northwest responding with the most "no" answers. Here are the 3 highest and 3 lowest:
3 Highest:
Mississippi – 85%
Alabama – 82%
South Carolina – 80%
3 Lowest:
Maine – 48%
New Hampshire – 46%
Vermont – 42%
My home state of Maryland comes in around the middle of the pack, with about 65% saying "yes".
Which brings me to the question in the title – Anybody want to plant a church in Vermont? I've heard multiple debates about whether or not it is more difficult to plant a church in different parts of the country. I think one would have to be quite naive to think that it is not. Is it measurable? Probably not, at least not accurately.
In order to even compare the effects location (by state) had on two different church plants, so many of the other factors would have to be the same. Same caliber leader, same size launch team, same quality people, same funding, same target demographic, same population density in target location, etc. In other words, nearly impossible.
Oh, and I don't consider religion a part of my daily life, but I do consider following Jesus a part of my daily life